Personally I feel that the coverage of natural disasters (i.e. earthquakes, hurricanes) employs a lot of the techniques used in tabloidization. As Cashmore discussed our cultures obsession with scandal, the sensationalism and gossip that is reported during natural disasters is clearly meant to stir public interest. The media recognizes that when rare events occur people are tuning in to find out more information and so it is their job to make sure they keep viewers interested by reporting stories that increase viewership. So there's always that segment ,between a scene of 100,000 dead people where its "After the break we'll show you how a 82 year old women survived a week under a building!" This is actually a true story from CNN. Granted, I don't blame the news outlets for showing things like this but I really feel the true interest behind reporting these stories is to stir public interest simply for the sake of increasing viewers. The positive role of the media in helping natural disaster victims is really undeniable. Had the earthquake in Haiti occurred before the advent of television and internet, the amount of time it would have taken for help to arrive would arguably have been much longer. In this way the media has done its part in spite of their occasional sensationalism.
Saturday, January 23, 2010
Earthquake in Haiti: A Pop Culture Movement
Personally I feel that the coverage of natural disasters (i.e. earthquakes, hurricanes) employs a lot of the techniques used in tabloidization. As Cashmore discussed our cultures obsession with scandal, the sensationalism and gossip that is reported during natural disasters is clearly meant to stir public interest. The media recognizes that when rare events occur people are tuning in to find out more information and so it is their job to make sure they keep viewers interested by reporting stories that increase viewership. So there's always that segment ,between a scene of 100,000 dead people where its "After the break we'll show you how a 82 year old women survived a week under a building!" This is actually a true story from CNN. Granted, I don't blame the news outlets for showing things like this but I really feel the true interest behind reporting these stories is to stir public interest simply for the sake of increasing viewers. The positive role of the media in helping natural disaster victims is really undeniable. Had the earthquake in Haiti occurred before the advent of television and internet, the amount of time it would have taken for help to arrive would arguably have been much longer. In this way the media has done its part in spite of their occasional sensationalism.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment